Feature Homes

Addiction treatment often lacks patient autonomy

By Fable Caldwell · · 4 min read
Addiction treatment often lacks patient autonomy - addiction treatment
A writer spent 22 days in a residential treatment facility.

The recovery industry’s approach to treating addiction has been criticized for prioritizing compliance over autonomy. A writer who spent 22 days in a residential treatment facility notes that the industry’s focus on powerlessness can be damaging, as it conditions individuals to distrust their own judgment and accept institutional authority without question.

In 12-step programs, admitting powerlessness can be a path to humility and mutual support. However, when institutions adopt this language, it can become an operating condition that reinforces learned powerlessness and undermines accountability.

Philosopher Miranda Fricker describes this phenomenon as testimonial injustice, where prejudice causes a listener to give someone’s account less credibility due to who they are, rather than what they’re saying. This can lead to harm, as seen in the writer’s own experience at a treatment facility, where they were dismissed and ultimately harmed due to the constraints under which the social services clerk was working.

Systemic Failures

Sociologist Michael Lipsky explains how well-meaning caseworkers can become the cause of harm due to the constraints of the system. Frontline workers with too many clients and too few resources may ration, screen, and rubber-stamp, routinizing situations that require a human response.

A survey of over 3,200 unhoused adults in eight California counties found that 41.6 percent began using illicit drugs before experiencing homelessness, while 23.2 percent began afterward. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration reports that among over 38 million adults with substance use disorders, only about 5.5 percent receive treatment.

One reason for this gap is the requirement of total abstinence in many treatment programs. Research has shown that leading indicators, such as emotional resilience and social support, are better predictors of recovery outcomes than abstinence alone. However, these indicators are often overlooked in favor of lagging indicators, such as relapse rates.

A person whose resilience is improving but hasn’t achieved abstinence may be seen as a failure under an abstinence-only framework. This can create an accountability vacuum, where neglect, exploitation, and fraud can flourish. The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office has charged a nonprofit CEO with defrauding the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, alleging that over $2 million was misused.

In Kentucky, a nonprofit provider of addiction treatment was found to have falsified medical records and agreed to a $16.2 million settlement with the federal government. These cases highlight the need for accountability and transparency in the recovery industry.

Reforming the Recovery Industry

This could involve tracking participants’ moods and progress over time, rather than relying on abstinence milestones. Arts-based and somatic practices, such as polyvagal theory, can help individuals build resilience and connection, rather than simply complying with treatment demands.

By focusing on safety, belonging, and embodied practice, treatment programs can create an environment that supports change and growth. This approach is not exotic, but rather a recognition of what works. As the writer notes, “the body receives regulation before the mind receives instruction.” By honoring this sequence, treatment programs can help individuals build trust and engage with the recovery process in a more meaningful way.

The writer suggests that instead of forcing compliance, the work should focus on addressing the conditions that make addiction more likely to take hold or harder to escape. This could involve recognizing that refusal of treatment may not be denial or resistance, but rather a rational calculation about what treatment demands. By listening to this feedback, the recovery industry can create a more responsive and effective system.

However, the writer also notes that the facility’s use of community-based approaches, such as the blacktop circle, was effective in creating a sense of safety and belonging. This highlights the need for a more subtle approach to recovery, one that balances structure and autonomy.

A healthy recovery system would prioritize tracking participants’ moods and progress over time. At A Beautiful You, records show an average improvement in mood among participants. Those who arrived in the greatest distress tended to report the largest changes.

Leading indicators, such as resilience and self-efficacy, are measured with tools like the Brief Resilience Scale and the Experiences Questionnaire. These indicators are tracked over time, rather than making a single abstinence milestone the sole test of success or failure.

Building Resilience and Connection

This focus on tapping into the mind-body connection is gaining increased mainstream academic attention. A song or physical exercise can help participants recognize when connection feels welcome and when they need to set a personal limit.

In practice, the order matters: people need to feel safe and trust that their boundaries will be respected before they can engage with a curriculum. Before someone can engage with a curriculum, they need to feel safe enough for their body to stop scanning the room for threat. Arts-based and somatic modalities work because they honor this sequence instead of skipping it.

Leave a Reply